Samsung Galaxy Note 2: Power within your hand

In a space fiercely competed by smartphones of different shapes and sizes, Samsung Galaxy Note 2 earned definitive upsmanship hands down in all categories. 

Coined as an amalgamation of phone and tablet, "phablet", it is by far the most promising smartphone to have ever graced the Androidworld. 

The technological tug of war between the Android phones is gradually meting out a conclusion that not only does the specs put you in the gold standard of measure but the overall handset experience. 

So let us see what are the things that will wow us in the Samsung Galaxy Note 2. 

As opposed to the 5.3" of its predecessor, it has a 5.5" 1280 x 720 Superduper AMOLED display but narrower so typing with one hand, especially reaching out to the far end keys, will be a breeze. The microUSB connector is found at the bottom, right beside where the S-Pen(Samsung's branding campaign to name its stylus) is. The 8MP camera has a LED flash and is able to produce crisp and vibrant photos. 

The front camera at 1.9MP is used for videocaling or perhaps in my case as an electronic mirror when I need fixing up. Best thing of it all is the 3100mAH battery to support the whopping Exynos quad core processor for your best Android 4.1.1 Jellybean experience. Pack it up with a 32GB of microSD and you're set for the best mobile multimedia experience in your life. This phone unleashes the power within you, the power to control life whenever mobile, wherever roads take you. 

One thing that I adore is the enhancement of the S-Pen experience which gives me the capability to send edited annotation and picture snippets to my colleagues or bosses. The sensitivity has vastly increased as well. and with the released version 2.2 of its S-Pen SDK, it will give them an upper hand in the developmental program to beef up the application even more. 

So hold on to that 13th month annual supplementary wage of yours for this lovely device. 

On Theory and Law

I have come across a college classmate of mine saying that "heck, the Big Bang is just a theory."

You see, we, men of science, have stopped using the word law right now, because a law might violate the future's random probability. 

To give you an example, philosopher J Carrol once said that "All gold sphere's are less than a mile in diameter." Sure it is, and it can be easily be put into a law as nobody had created a gold that big yet, but what if someday a certain Arab Sheikh will spend all his fortunes creating one. 

That is is just good as saying that "all Uranium 235 are less than a mile in diameter." Again true, and it can be one of the laws of particle physics because once Uranium 235 will reach beyond its critical mass, or more than six inches in diameter, it would become unstable and will kaboom into a nuclear explosion. But what will stop one mad scientist from creating one. 

So saying that a law has a higher degree of veracity than a theory is even a misnomer. 

Even existing laws are consistent on a certain set of conditions only. They are true at a particular mathematical length. Look at Newton's Law of Motion, it has all its drawback once the velocity is nearing the speed of light. Not only does it have a problem on high speed, there are also restrains from space contraction, spontaneity and mass variability. That also goes true with the Theory of Relativity which breaks down to explain the conditions of a Black Hole and the physics before Big Bang. 

What I am saying is that the LAW has much same intensity of candor and truthfulness there is as with a THEORY.